↓ Skip to main content

Nanofibers and nanoparticles from the insect-capturing adhesive of the Sundew (Drosera) for cell attachment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanofibers and nanoparticles from the insect-capturing adhesive of the Sundew (Drosera) for cell attachment
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-8-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mingjun Zhang, Scott C Lenaghan, Lijin Xia, Lixin Dong, Wei He, William R Henson, Xudong Fan

Abstract

The search for naturally occurring nanocomposites with diverse properties for tissue engineering has been a major interest for biomaterial research. In this study, we investigated a nanofiber and nanoparticle based nanocomposite secreted from an insect-capturing plant, the Sundew, for cell attachment. The adhesive nanocomposite has demonstrated high biocompatibility and is ready to be used with minimal preparation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 31%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Engineering 7 12%
Materials Science 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#237
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,425
of 104,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.