↓ Skip to main content

Untested, unproven, and unethical: the promotion and provision of autologous stem cell therapies in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Untested, unproven, and unethical: the promotion and provision of autologous stem cell therapies in Australia
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0047-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison K McLean, Cameron Stewart, Ian Kerridge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,975,501
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#680
of 2,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,964
of 355,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.