↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study of design stakeholders’ views of developing and implementing a registry-based learning health system

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative study of design stakeholders’ views of developing and implementing a registry-based learning health system
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-0976-1
Authors

Mary Dixon-Woods, Anne Campbell, Trillium Chang, Graham Martin, Alexandros Georgiadis, Veronica Heney, Sarah Chew, Aricca Van Citters, Kathryn A. Sabadosa, Eugene C. Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Psychology 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#760,951
of 22,609,602 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#108
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,844
of 289,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,609,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them