↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective cohort pilot study to evaluate a triage tool for use in a pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective cohort pilot study to evaluate a triage tool for use in a pandemic
Published in
Critical Care, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc8146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D Christian, Cindy Hamielec, Neil M Lazar, Randy S Wax, Lauren Griffith, Margaret S Herridge, David Lee, Deborah J Cook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,711,849
of 17,180,396 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,724
of 5,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,984
of 267,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them