↓ Skip to main content

Birt-Hogg-Dubé renal tumors are genetically distinct from other renal neoplasias and are associated with up-regulation of mitochondrial gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,237)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birt-Hogg-Dubé renal tumors are genetically distinct from other renal neoplasias and are associated with up-regulation of mitochondrial gene expression
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-3-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff A Klomp, David Petillo, Natalie M Niemi, Karl J Dykema, Jindong Chen, Ximing J Yang, Annika Sääf, Peter Zickert, Markus Aly, Ulf Bergerheim, Magnus Nordenskjöld, Sophie Gad, Sophie Giraud, Yves Denoux, Laurent Yonneau, Arnaud Méjean, Viorel Vasiliu, Stéphane Richard, Jeffrey P MacKeigan, Bin T Teh, Kyle A Furge

Abstract

Germline mutations in the folliculin (FLCN) gene are associated with the development of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHDS), a disease characterized by papular skin lesions, a high occurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax, and the development of renal neoplasias. The majority of renal tumors that arise in BHDS-affected individuals are histologically similar to sporadic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and sporadic renal oncocytoma. However, most sporadic tumors lack FLCN mutations and the extent to which the BHDS-derived renal tumors share genetic defects associated with the sporadic tumors has not been well studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#954,915
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#18
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,652
of 181,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.