You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The immune landscape of esophageal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Communications, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40880-019-0427-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tu-Xiong Huang, Li Fu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 23% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,609,577
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Communications
#205
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,504
of 459,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Communications
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.