↓ Skip to main content

Structural factors and best practices in implementing a linkage to HIV care program using the ARTAS model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural factors and best practices in implementing a linkage to HIV care program using the ARTAS model
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Craw, Lytt Gardner, Amber Rossman, DeAnn Gruber, O'Donnell Noreen, Diana Jordan, Richard Rapp, Cathy Simpson, Karen Phillips

Abstract

Implementation of linkage to HIV care programs in the U.S. is poorly described in the literature despite the central role of these programs in delivering clients from HIV testing facilities to clinical care sites. Models demonstrating success in linking clients to HIV care from testing locations that do not have co-located medical care are especially needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Kenya 1 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Social Sciences 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,693,812
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,226
of 7,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,552
of 94,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.