↓ Skip to main content

Randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of within versus across-category front-of-package lower-calorie labelling on food demand

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of within versus across-category front-of-package lower-calorie labelling on food demand
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-8434-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Felicia Jia Ler Ang, Brett Doble

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 34 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Psychology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 35 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,558,249
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,870
of 15,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,066
of 366,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#172
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.