You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40985-020-00119-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin P. Rigby, Caroline J. Dodd-Reynolds, Emily J. Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 57% |
| Ireland | 3 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,443,424
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#65
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,728
of 390,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.