You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00942-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marianne Huebner, Werner Vach, Saskia le Cessie, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Lara Lusa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Belgium | 1 | 10% |
Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 28 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 23% |
Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,932,028
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#833
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,692
of 366,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#27
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.