↓ Skip to main content

Seagrass canopies and the performance of acoustic telemetry: implications for the interpretation of fish movements

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seagrass canopies and the performance of acoustic telemetry: implications for the interpretation of fish movements
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40317-020-00197-w
Authors

Daniel S. Swadling, Nathan A. Knott, Matthew J. Rees, Hugh Pederson, Kye R. Adams, Matthew D. Taylor, Andrew R. Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 30%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,410,530
of 24,145,400 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#109
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,144
of 368,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,145,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.