You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Yeast 5 – an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-6-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin D Heavner, Kieran Smallbone, Brandon Barker, Pedro Mendes, Larry P Walker |
| Abstract |
Efforts to improve the computational reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae biochemical reaction network and to refine the stoichiometrically constrained metabolic models that can be derived from such a reconstruction have continued since the first stoichiometrically constrained yeast genome scale metabolic model was published in 2003. Continuing this ongoing process, we have constructed an update to the Yeast Consensus Reconstruction, Yeast 5. The Yeast Consensus Reconstruction is a product of efforts to forge a community-based reconstruction emphasizing standards compliance and biochemical accuracy via evidence-based selection of reactions. It draws upon models published by a variety of independent research groups as well as information obtained from biochemical databases and primary literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 28% |
| Researcher | 54 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 111 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 8% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,438,206
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#119
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,857
of 171,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.