↓ Skip to main content

Best practice for collar deployment of tri-axial accelerometers on a terrestrial quadruped to provide accurate measurement of body acceleration

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practice for collar deployment of tri-axial accelerometers on a terrestrial quadruped to provide accurate measurement of body acceleration
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40317-020-00198-9
Authors

Eleanor R. Dickinson, Philip A. Stephens, Nikki J. Marks, Rory P. Wilson, David M. Scantlebury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 49%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,803,736
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#99
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,727
of 367,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.