↓ Skip to main content

Is the Scottish population living dangerously? Prevalence of multiple risk factors: the Scottish Health Survey 2003

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Scottish population living dangerously? Prevalence of multiple risk factors: the Scottish Health Survey 2003
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Lawder, Oliver Harding, Diane Stockton, Colin Fischbacher, David H Brewster, Jim Chalmers, Alan Finlayson, David I Conway

Abstract

Risk factors are often considered individually, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of combinations of multiple behavioural risk factors and their association with socioeconomic determinants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Psychology 9 15%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,585,127
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,288
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,419
of 99,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#61
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.