↓ Skip to main content

Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 313)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayako Sugawara, Yuri Terasawa, Ruri Katsunuma, Atsushi Sekiguchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 43 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 34%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 46 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,504,612
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#29
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,356
of 394,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.