↓ Skip to main content

ANACONDA: a new tool to improve mortality and cause of death data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ANACONDA: a new tool to improve mortality and cause of death data
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01521-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lene Mikkelsen, Kim Moesgaard, Michael Hegnauer, Alan D. Lopez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,473,662
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,969
of 3,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,495
of 369,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#59
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.