↓ Skip to main content

Can traditional bonesetters become trained technicians? Feasibility study among a cohort of Nigerian traditional bonesetters

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can traditional bonesetters become trained technicians? Feasibility study among a cohort of Nigerian traditional bonesetters
Published in
Human Resources for Health, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12960-020-00468-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ndubuisi Onu Onyemaechi, Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Paulinus Okechukwu Ossai, Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Lecturer 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 30 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,268,461
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#827
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,121
of 391,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.