↓ Skip to main content

Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medical Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 443)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
919 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1472 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Published in
Military Medical Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin-Lu Ma, Yun-Yun Wang, Zhi-Hua Yang, Di Huang, Hong Weng, Xian-Tao Zeng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1472 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 213 14%
Student > Bachelor 165 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 8%
Researcher 106 7%
Other 64 4%
Other 212 14%
Unknown 596 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 291 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 178 12%
Psychology 65 4%
Sports and Recreations 39 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 2%
Other 222 15%
Unknown 643 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,205,800
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Military Medical Research
#17
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,635
of 382,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medical Research
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.