You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pilot randomised controlled trial of personalised care for depressed patients with symptomatic coronary heart disease in South London general practices: the UPBEAT-UK RCT protocol and recruitment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Tylee, Mark Haddad, Elizabeth Barley, Mark Ashworth, June Brown, John Chambers, Anne Farmer, Zoe Fortune, Rebecca Lawton, Morven Leese, Anthony Mann, Paul McCrone, Joanna Murray, Carmine Pariante, Rachel Phillips, Diana Rose, Gill Rowlands, Ramon Sabes-Figuera, Alison Smith, Paul Walters |
| Abstract |
Community studies reveal people with coronary heart disease (CHD) are twice as likely to be depressed as the general population and that this co-morbidity negatively affects the course and outcome of both conditions. There is evidence for the efficacy of collaborative care and case management for depression treatment, and whilst NICE guidelines recommend these approaches only where depression has not responded to psychological, pharmacological, or combined treatments, these care approaches may be particularly relevant to the needs of people with CHD and depression in the earlier stages of stepped care in primary care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Egypt | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,084,334
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,987
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,861
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.