↓ Skip to main content

The Depression in Visual Impairment Trial (DEPVIT): trial design and protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Depression in Visual Impairment Trial (DEPVIT): trial design and protocol
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom H Margrain, Claire Nollett, Julia Shearn, Miles Stanford, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Barbara Ryan, Catey Bunce, Robin Casten, Mark T Hegel, Daniel J Smith

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression in people with a visual disability is high but screening for depression and referral for treatment is not yet an integral part of visual rehabilitation service provision. One reason for this may be that there is no good evidence about the effectiveness of treatments in this patient group. This study is the first to evaluate the effect of depression treatments on people with a visual impairment and co morbid depression. Methods /design: The study is an exploratory, multicentre, individually randomised waiting list controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to receive Problem Solving Therapy (PST), a 'referral to the GP' requesting treatment according to the NICE's 'stepped care' recommendations or the waiting list arm of the trial. The primary outcome measure is change (from randomisation) in depressive symptoms as measured by the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include change in depressive symptoms at 3 months, change in visual function as measured with the near vision subscale of the VFQ-48 and 7 item NEI-VFQ at 3 and 6 months, change in generic health related quality of life (EQ5D), the costs associated with PST, estimates of incremental cost effectiveness, and recruitment rate estimation. DISCUSSION: Depression is prevalent in people with disabling visual impairment. This exploratory study will establish depression screening and referral for treatment in visual rehabilitation clinics in the UK. It will be the first to explore the efficacy of PST and the effectiveness of NICE's 'stepped care' approach to the treatment of depression in people with a visual impairment. Trial registration: ISRCTN46824140.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Other 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 44 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 23%
Psychology 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 49 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,546,628
of 25,006,193 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,172
of 5,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,554
of 172,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#34
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,006,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.