↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Filaria Journal, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


29 Dimensions

Readers on

60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Filaria Journal, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-2883-4-5
Pubmed ID

Tim Oqueka, Taniawati Supali, Is Ismid, Purnomo, Paul Rückert, Mark Bradley, Peter Fischer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 3%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 6 10%
Lecturer 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Filaria Journal
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 276,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Filaria Journal
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them