↓ Skip to main content

The greatest risk for low-back pain among newly educated female health care workers; body weight or physical work load?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The greatest risk for low-back pain among newly educated female health care workers; body weight or physical work load?
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-87
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jette Nygaard Jensen, Andreas Holtermann, Thomas Clausen, Ole Steen Mortensen, Isabella Gomes Carneiro, Lars Louis Andersen

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) represents a major socioeconomic burden for the Western societies. Both life-style and work-related factors may cause low back pain. Prospective cohort studies assessing risk factors among individuals without prior history of low back pain are lacking. This aim of this study was to determine risk factors for developing low back pain (LBP) among health care workers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Unspecified 7 5%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,068,344
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#803
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,390
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.