You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BioWord: A sequence manipulation suite for Microsoft Word
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura J Anzaldi, Daniel Muñoz-Fernández, Ivan Erill |
| Abstract |
The ability to manipulate, edit and process DNA and protein sequences has rapidly become a necessary skill for practicing biologists across a wide swath of disciplines. In spite of this, most everyday sequence manipulation tools are distributed across several programs and web servers, sometimes requiring installation and typically involving frequent switching between applications. To address this problem, here we have developed BioWord, a macro-enabled self-installing template for Microsoft Word documents that integrates an extensive suite of DNA and protein sequence manipulation tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Malawi | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 51% |
| Scientists | 39 | 48% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 115 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#607,064
of 25,058,660 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 7,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,899
of 172,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.