You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What influences a patient’s decision to use custom-made orthopaedic shoes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaap J van Netten, Pieter U Dijkstra, Jan H B Geertzen, Klaas Postema |
| Abstract |
Despite potential benefits, some patients decide not to use their custom-made orthopaedic shoes (OS). Factors are known in the domains 'usability', 'communication and service', and 'opinion of others' that influence a patient's decision to use OS. However, the interplay between these factors has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between factors concerning OS, and the influences thereof on a patient's decision to use OS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Design | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,750,802
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,307
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,552
of 166,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.