You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical arguments concerning human-animal chimera research: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00465-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koko Kwisda, Lucie White, Dietmar Hübner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,028,325
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#67
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,329
of 374,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.