↓ Skip to main content

Automatic de-identification of textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic de-identification of textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephane M Meystre, F Jeffrey Friedlin, Brett R South, Shuying Shen, Matthew H Samore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 258 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 19 7%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 99 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 76 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,799,341
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#769
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,771
of 106,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.