You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early and individualized goal-directed therapy for trauma-induced coagulopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-20-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Herbert Schöchl, Marc Maegele, Cristina Solomon, Klaus Görlinger, Wolfgang Voelckel |
| Abstract |
Severe trauma-related bleeding is associated with high mortality. Standard coagulation tests provide limited information on the underlying coagulation disorder. Whole-blood viscoelastic tests such as rotational thromboelastometry or thrombelastography offer a more comprehensive insight into the coagulation process in trauma. The results are available within minutes and they provide information about the initiation of coagulation, the speed of clot formation, and the quality and stability of the clot. Viscoelastic tests have the potential to guide coagulation therapy according to the actual needs of each patient, reducing the risks of over- or under-transfusion. The concept of early, individualized and goal-directed therapy is explored in this review and the AUVA Trauma Hospital algorithm for managing trauma-induced coagulopathy is presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 44 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 74% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,196,160
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#495
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,081
of 168,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.