You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-52 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea M Patey, Rafat Islam, Jill J Francis, Gregory L Bryson, Jeremy M Grimshaw, the Canada PRIME Plus Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 27% |
| Psychology | 43 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,013
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,529
of 182,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.