You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
‘The problem is small enough, the problem is big enough’: a qualitative study of health technology assessment and public policy on drug funding decisions for children
International Journal for Equity in Health, March 2020
Avram E. Denburg, Mita Giacomini, Wendy J. Ungar, Julia Abelson
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||7||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||12%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||6||12%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||3||6%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 373,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.