↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of exercise as a treatment for postnatal depression: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of exercise as a treatment for postnatal depression: study protocol
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J Daley, Kate Jolly, Debbie J Sharp, Katrina M Turner, Ruth V Blamey, Sarah Coleman, Mary McGuinness, Andrea K Roalfe, Ian Jones, Christine MacArthur

Abstract

Postnatal depression can have a substantial impact on the woman, the child and family as a whole. Thus, there is a need to examine different ways of helping women experiencing postnatal depression; encouraging them to exercise may be one way. A meta analysis found some support for exercise as an adjunctive treatment for postnatal depression but the methodological inadequacy of the few small studies included means that it is uncertain whether exercise reduces symptoms of postnatal depression. We aim to determine whether a pragmatic exercise intervention that involves one-to-one personalised exercise consultations and telephone support plus usual care in women with postnatal depression, is superior to usual care only, in reducing symptoms of postnatal depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 286 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 23%
Psychology 45 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 15%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 79 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,991,360
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,109
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,817
of 166,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.