↓ Skip to main content

An embedded longitudinal multi-faceted qualitative evaluation of a complex cluster randomized controlled trial aiming to reduce clinically important errors in medicines management in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An embedded longitudinal multi-faceted qualitative evaluation of a complex cluster randomized controlled trial aiming to reduce clinically important errors in medicines management in general practice
Published in
Trials, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin M Cresswell, Stacey Sadler, Sarah Rodgers, Anthony Avery, Judith Cantrill, Scott A Murray, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract

There is a need to shed light on the pathways through which complex interventions mediate their effects in order to enable critical reflection on their transferability. We sought to explore and understand key stakeholder accounts of the acceptability, likely impact and strategies for optimizing and rolling-out a successful pharmacist-led information technology-enabled (PINCER) intervention, which substantially reduced the risk of clinically important errors in medicines management in primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Psychology 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 45 26%