↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the effectiveness of the output-based aid voucher program to increase uptake of gender-based violence recovery services in Kenya: A qualitative evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the effectiveness of the output-based aid voucher program to increase uptake of gender-based violence recovery services in Kenya: A qualitative evaluation
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Njuki, Jerry Okal, Charlotte E Warren, Francis Obare, Timothy Abuya, Lucy Kanya, Chi-Chi Undie, Ben Bellows, Ian Askew

Abstract

Few studies in Africa have explored in detail the ability of output-based aid (OBA) voucher programs to increase access to gender-based violence recovery (GBVR) services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Psychology 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 27 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,047,519
of 12,368,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,306
of 8,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,674
of 120,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,368,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.