↓ Skip to main content

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence of the opportunistic oral pathogen Prevotella multisaccharivorax type strain (PPPA20T)

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-contiguous finished genome sequence of the opportunistic oral pathogen Prevotella multisaccharivorax type strain (PPPA20T)
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, October 2011
DOI 10.4056/sigs.2164949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amrita Pati, Sabine Gronow, Megan Lu, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Marcel Huntemann, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, John C. Detter, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Natalia Ivanova

Abstract

Prevotella multisaccharivorax Sakamoto et al. 2005 is a species of the large genus Prevotella, which belongs to the family Prevotellaceae. The species is of medical interest because its members are able to cause diseases in the human oral cavity such as periodontitis, root caries and others. Although 77 Prevotella genomes have already been sequenced or are targeted for sequencing, this is only the second completed genome sequence of a type strain of a species within the genus Prevotella to be published. The 3,388,644 bp long genome is assembled in three non-contiguous contigs, harbors 2,876 protein-coding and 75 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#720
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,569
of 149,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.