You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete genome sequence of Sulfurimonas autotrophica type strain (OK10T)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.1173118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Sikorski, Christine Munk, Alla Lapidus, Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Hope Tice, Cliff Han, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, David Sims, Linda Meincke, Thomas Brettin, John C. Detter, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D. Jeffries, Manfred Rohde, Elke Lang, Stefan Spring, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk |
| Abstract |
Sulfurimonas autotrophica Inagaki et al. 2003 is the type species of the genus Sulfurimonas. This genus is of interest because of its significant contribution to the global sulfur cycle as it oxidizes sulfur compounds to sulfate and by its apparent habitation of deep-sea hydrothermal and marine sulfidic environments as potential ecological niche. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the second complete genome sequence of the genus Sulfurimonas and the 15(th) genome in the family Helicobacteraceae. The 2,153,198 bp long genome with its 2,165 protein-coding and 55 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#248
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,102
of 109,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.