You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah Cuthbertson, Alan W. Walker, Anna E. Oliver, Geraint B. Rogers, Damian W. Rivett, Thomas H. Hampton, Alix Ashare, J. Stuart Elborn, Anthony De Soyza, Mary P. Carroll, Lucas R. Hoffman, Clare Lanyon, Samuel M. Moskowitz, George A. O’Toole, Julian Parkhill, Paul J. Planet, Charlotte C. Teneback, Michael M. Tunney, Jonathan B. Zuckerman, Kenneth D. Bruce, Christopher J. van der Gast |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 7 | 17% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
| Scientists | 14 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 29 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,160,443
of 24,649,404 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#368
of 1,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,257
of 374,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,649,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.