↓ Skip to main content

Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
508 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-7-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon G Gregory, Jessica J Connelly, Aaron J Towers, Jessica Johnson, Dhani Biscocho, Christina A Markunas, Carla Lintas, Ruth K Abramson, Harry H Wright, Peter Ellis, Cordelia F Langford, Gordon Worley, G Robert Delong, Susan K Murphy, Michael L Cuccaro, Antonello Persico, Margaret A Pericak-Vance

Abstract

Autism comprises a spectrum of behavioral and cognitive disturbances of childhood development and is known to be highly heritable. Although numerous approaches have been used to identify genes implicated in the development of autism, less than 10% of autism cases have been attributed to single gene disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 538 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 139 24%
Researcher 82 14%
Student > Bachelor 75 13%
Student > Master 62 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 107 19%
Unknown 68 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 20%
Psychology 110 19%
Neuroscience 83 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 9%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 95 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#770,899
of 25,337,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#542
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,855
of 103,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,337,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.