↓ Skip to main content

Traditional food and herbal uses of wild plants in the ancient South-Slavic diaspora of Mundimitar/Montemitro (Southern Italy)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional food and herbal uses of wild plants in the ancient South-Slavic diaspora of Mundimitar/Montemitro (Southern Italy)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-8-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro di Tizio, Łukasz Jakub Łuczaj, Cassandra L Quave, Sulejman Redžić, Andrea Pieroni

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 36%
Environmental Science 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2012.
All research outputs
#12,331,612
of 20,957,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#421
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,331
of 142,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,957,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them