↓ Skip to main content

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: Plasmodium falciparum infections with high parasite densities may generate false positive Plasmodium vivax pLDH lines

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: Plasmodium falciparum infections with high parasite densities may generate false positive Plasmodium vivax pLDH lines
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Maltha, Philippe Gillet, Lieselotte Cnops, Jef van den Ende, Marjan van Esbroeck, Jan Jacobs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,488
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,295
of 95,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#23
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.