↓ Skip to main content

Guy’s cancer cohort – real world evidence for cancer pathways

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog


11 Dimensions

Readers on

21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Guy’s cancer cohort – real world evidence for cancer pathways
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12885-020-6667-0
Pubmed ID

C. Moss, A. Haire, F. Cahill, D. Enting, S. Hughes, D. Smith, E. Sawyer, A. Davies, J. Zylstra, K. Haire, A. Rigg, M. Van Hemelrijck

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Social Sciences 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
of 17,730,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
of 6,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 280,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,730,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them