↓ Skip to main content

Methodologies used to estimate tobacco-attributable mortality: a review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodologies used to estimate tobacco-attributable mortality: a review
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Agustín Montes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Social Sciences 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,053
of 15,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,994
of 156,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.