↓ Skip to main content

Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
806 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
999 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Segata, Susan Kinder Haake, Peter Mannon, Katherine P Lemon, Levi Waldron, Dirk Gevers, Curtis Huttenhower, Jacques Izard

Abstract

To understand the relationship between our bacterial microbiome and health, it is essential to define the microbiome in the absence of disease. The digestive tract includes diverse habitats and hosts the human body's greatest bacterial density. We describe the bacterial community composition of ten digestive tract sites from more than 200 normal adults enrolled in the Human Microbiome Project, and metagenomically determined metabolic potentials of four representative sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 999 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 956 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 183 18%
Researcher 170 17%
Student > Master 122 12%
Student > Bachelor 90 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 5%
Other 165 17%
Unknown 219 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 283 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 163 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 116 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 59 6%
Computer Science 19 2%
Other 102 10%
Unknown 257 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#760,134
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#495
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,763
of 182,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.