↓ Skip to main content

Interactive effects of neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate and aspartame on glucose homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactive effects of neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate and aspartame on glucose homeostasis
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-9-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate S Collison, Nadine J Makhoul, Marya Z Zaidi, Rana Al-Rabiah, Angela Inglis, Bernard L Andres, Rosario Ubungen, Mohammed Shoukri, Futwan A Al-Mohanna

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the effects of certain food additives may be synergistic or additive. Aspartame (ASP) and Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) are ubiquitous food additives with a common moiety: both contain acidic amino acids which can act as neurotransmitters, interacting with NMDA receptors concentrated in areas of the Central Nervous System regulating energy expenditure and conservation. MSG has been shown to promote a neuroendocrine dysfunction when large quantities are administered to mammals during the neonatal period. ASP is a low-calorie dipeptide sweetener found in a wide variety of diet beverages and foods. However, recent reports suggest that ASP may promote weight gain and hyperglycemia in a zebrafish nutritional model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 21%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,504,081
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#193
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,340
of 181,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.