You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Supporting health behaviour change in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with telephone health-mentoring: insights from a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-13-55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia A E Walters, Helen Cameron-Tucker, Helen Courtney-Pratt, Mark Nelson, Andrew Robinson, Jenn Scott, Paul Turner, E Haydn Walters, Richard Wood-Baker |
Abstract |
Adoption and maintenance of healthy behaviours is pivotal to chronic disease self-management as this influences disease progression and impact. This qualitative study investigated health behaviour changes adopted by participants with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recruited to a randomised controlled study of telephone-delivered health-mentoring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 54 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
Researcher | 36 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Other | 47 | 17% |
Unknown | 55 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 17% |
Psychology | 26 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 32 | 12% |
Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,065,296
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,359
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,267
of 181,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.