↓ Skip to main content

Myofibrillar protein synthesis following ingestion of soy protein isolate at rest and after resistance exercise in elderly men

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
85 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myofibrillar protein synthesis following ingestion of soy protein isolate at rest and after resistance exercise in elderly men
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-9-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yifan Yang, Tyler A Churchward-Venne, Nicholas A Burd, Leigh Breen, Mark A Tarnopolsky, Stuart M Phillips

Abstract

Increased amino acid availability stimulates muscle protein synthesis, however, aged muscle appears less responsive to the anabolic effects of amino acids when compared to the young. We aimed to compare changes in myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) in elderly men at rest and after resistance exercise following ingestion of different doses of soy protein and compare the responses to those we previously observed with ingestion of whey protein isolate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 58 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 51 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 72 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#345,547
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#58
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,562
of 181,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.