↓ Skip to main content

Surveillance in surgery prevents infections and ensures good quality of care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surveillance in surgery prevents infections and ensures good quality of care
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-7-s1-a3
Authors

Diana Vilar-Compte, Samuel Rosales Pérez, Inés Álvarez de Iturbe, Eduardo Maafs, Carlos Robles-Vidal, Enrique Bargallo, Ma Cruz Pérez-Amador, Patricia Volkow

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,893,368
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,167
of 8,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,313
of 164,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.