You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and therapy responsive traits among preclinical models: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12931-020-01337-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrien Carla, Bruno Pereira, Hanifa Boukail, Jules Audard, Nathalie Pinol-Domenech, Manuela De Carvalho, Raiko Blondonnet, Ruoyang Zhai, Dominique Morand, Céline Lambert, Vincent Sapin, Lorraine B. Ware, Carolyn S. Calfee, Julie A. Bastarache, John G. Laffey, Nicole P. Juffermans, Lieuwe D. Bos, Antonio Artigas, Patricia R. M. Rocco, Michael A. Matthay, Daniel F. McAuley, Jean-Michel Constantin, Matthieu Jabaudon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,399,152
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,347
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,418
of 399,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#17
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.