You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of oral zinc in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-74 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Norberto C Chavez-Tapia, Asunción Cesar-Arce, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Francisco A Villegas-López, Nahum Méndez-Sanchez, Misael Uribe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 23% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 36% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,604,607
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,173
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,431
of 198,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#44
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.