You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mechanistic model of infection: why duration and intensity of contacts should be included in models of disease spread
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-6-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timo Smieszek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 12% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,604,607
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#170
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,919
of 167,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.