↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of QTL-linked and genome-wide restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) markers in farmed Atlantic salmon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation of QTL-linked and genome-wide restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) markers in farmed Atlantic salmon
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross D Houston, John W Davey, Stephen C Bishop, Natalie R Lowe, Jose C Mota-Velasco, Alastair Hamilton, Derrick R Guy, Alan E Tinch, Marian L Thomson, Mark L Blaxter, Karim Gharbi, James E Bron, John B Taggart

Abstract

Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-Seq) is a genome complexity reduction technique that facilitates large-scale marker discovery and genotyping by sequencing. Recent applications of RAD-Seq have included linkage and QTL mapping with a particular focus on non-model species. In the current study, we have applied RAD-Seq to two Atlantic salmon families from a commercial breeding program. The offspring from these families were classified into resistant or susceptible based on survival/mortality in an Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis (IPN) challenge experiment, and putative homozygous resistant or susceptible genotype at a major IPN-resistance QTL. From each family, the genomic DNA of the two heterozygous parents and seven offspring of each IPN phenotype and genotype was digested with the SbfI enzyme and sequenced in multiplexed pools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Norway 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 259 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 22%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 9%
Environmental Science 8 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 38 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,141,455
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#997
of 11,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,017
of 179,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.