↓ Skip to main content

Should the PBL tutor be present? A cross-sectional study of group effectiveness in synchronous and asynchronous settings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should the PBL tutor be present? A cross-sectional study of group effectiveness in synchronous and asynchronous settings
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02018-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Edelbring, Siw Alehagen, Evalotte Mörelius, AnnaKarin Johansson, Patrik Rytterström

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Lecturer 7 7%
Professor 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 51 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 53 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,192,454
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,926
of 3,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,510
of 370,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#35
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.